murine breast cancer 4t1 cell lines Search Results


90
China Center for Type Culture Collection mouse mammary tumor cells 4t1
Mouse Mammary Tumor Cells 4t1, supplied by China Center for Type Culture Collection, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse mammary tumor cells 4t1/product/China Center for Type Culture Collection
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse mammary tumor cells 4t1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
AddexBio Inc murine breast carcinoma 4t1 cell line
Murine Breast Carcinoma 4t1 Cell Line, supplied by AddexBio Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/murine breast carcinoma 4t1 cell line/product/AddexBio Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
murine breast carcinoma 4t1 cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Norian Corporation murine triple-negative breast cancer cell line-4t1
Murine Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Line 4t1, supplied by Norian Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/murine triple-negative breast cancer cell line-4t1/product/Norian Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
murine triple-negative breast cancer cell line-4t1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
New Brunswick Scientific 4t1 murine breast cancer cell line
Passive tumor distribution of PEG nanocarriers measured non-invasively using a SkinSkan® spectrofluorometer. Nanocarriers (0.5 mM) were intravenously administered to <t>4T1</t> tumor-bearing balb/c mice and fluorescence spectra were collected from tumor and a contralateral skin (λexc.: 480 nm; λem.: 515 nm for 10–30 kDa and 520 nm for 40–60 kDa). Each column and error bar represents the mean±SD (n = 5–7). Individual comparisons between the groups were determined by Student’s t-test using the Microsoft Excel 2008. *: p<0.05, tumor vs. corresponding dermal control site.
4t1 Murine Breast Cancer Cell Line, supplied by New Brunswick Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/4t1 murine breast cancer cell line/product/New Brunswick Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
4t1 murine breast cancer cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
EnoGene Inc murine breast tumor cell line 4t1
Passive tumor distribution of PEG nanocarriers measured non-invasively using a SkinSkan® spectrofluorometer. Nanocarriers (0.5 mM) were intravenously administered to <t>4T1</t> tumor-bearing balb/c mice and fluorescence spectra were collected from tumor and a contralateral skin (λexc.: 480 nm; λem.: 515 nm for 10–30 kDa and 520 nm for 40–60 kDa). Each column and error bar represents the mean±SD (n = 5–7). Individual comparisons between the groups were determined by Student’s t-test using the Microsoft Excel 2008. *: p<0.05, tumor vs. corresponding dermal control site.
Murine Breast Tumor Cell Line 4t1, supplied by EnoGene Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/murine breast tumor cell line 4t1/product/EnoGene Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
murine breast tumor cell line 4t1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Passive tumor distribution of PEG nanocarriers measured non-invasively using a SkinSkan® spectrofluorometer. Nanocarriers (0.5 mM) were intravenously administered to 4T1 tumor-bearing balb/c mice and fluorescence spectra were collected from tumor and a contralateral skin (λexc.: 480 nm; λem.: 515 nm for 10–30 kDa and 520 nm for 40–60 kDa). Each column and error bar represents the mean±SD (n = 5–7). Individual comparisons between the groups were determined by Student’s t-test using the Microsoft Excel 2008. *: p<0.05, tumor vs. corresponding dermal control site.

Journal: Molecular Pharmaceutics

Article Title: Non-Invasive Detection of Passively Targeted Poly(ethylene glycol) Nanocarriers in Tumors

doi: 10.1021/mp2003913

Figure Lengend Snippet: Passive tumor distribution of PEG nanocarriers measured non-invasively using a SkinSkan® spectrofluorometer. Nanocarriers (0.5 mM) were intravenously administered to 4T1 tumor-bearing balb/c mice and fluorescence spectra were collected from tumor and a contralateral skin (λexc.: 480 nm; λem.: 515 nm for 10–30 kDa and 520 nm for 40–60 kDa). Each column and error bar represents the mean±SD (n = 5–7). Individual comparisons between the groups were determined by Student’s t-test using the Microsoft Excel 2008. *: p<0.05, tumor vs. corresponding dermal control site.

Article Snippet: The 4T1 murine breast cancer cell line was a generous gift from Dr. Michael Reiss, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey (New Brunswick, NJ).

Techniques: Fluorescence, Control

(A) Non-invasive images showing the passive tumor distribution of PEG nanocarriers. The images were obtained on an IVIS® 100 imaging system using the excitation and emission filters corresponding to green fluorescent protein (GFP). The first two animals (balb/c mice with 4T1 tumor), starting from the left, were untreated (controls), whereas the remaining three animals were administered nanocarriers (0.5 mM) intravenously; (B) Regions of interest for tumor and control areas are shown in a mouse injected with 40 kDa nanocarrier for average efficient quantitation; and (C) Plots of average fluorescence from tumor and control site at skin’s surface against time. Each point represents the mean±SD (n = 3). Individual comparisons between groups were determined by Student’s t-test using the Microsoft Excel 2008. *: p<0.01, tumor vs. corresponding control site.

Journal: Molecular Pharmaceutics

Article Title: Non-Invasive Detection of Passively Targeted Poly(ethylene glycol) Nanocarriers in Tumors

doi: 10.1021/mp2003913

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Non-invasive images showing the passive tumor distribution of PEG nanocarriers. The images were obtained on an IVIS® 100 imaging system using the excitation and emission filters corresponding to green fluorescent protein (GFP). The first two animals (balb/c mice with 4T1 tumor), starting from the left, were untreated (controls), whereas the remaining three animals were administered nanocarriers (0.5 mM) intravenously; (B) Regions of interest for tumor and control areas are shown in a mouse injected with 40 kDa nanocarrier for average efficient quantitation; and (C) Plots of average fluorescence from tumor and control site at skin’s surface against time. Each point represents the mean±SD (n = 3). Individual comparisons between groups were determined by Student’s t-test using the Microsoft Excel 2008. *: p<0.01, tumor vs. corresponding control site.

Article Snippet: The 4T1 murine breast cancer cell line was a generous gift from Dr. Michael Reiss, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey (New Brunswick, NJ).

Techniques: Imaging, Control, Injection, Quantitation Assay, Fluorescence

Ex vivo distribution studies: (A) Tissue distribution at 24 hrs; (B) Tumor distribution at 24 and 96 hrs; and (C) Plasma distribution at 24 and 96 hrs. PEG nanocarriers (0.5 mM) were intravenously administered to balb/c mice bearing 4T1 tumors and animals were euthanized to collect tissues. Each column and error bar represents the mean±SD (n = 5–7). The statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism v.4 as follows: (A) Two-way ANOVA and individual comparison between the groups were determined using Bonferroni posttests. The statistically significant groups (p<0.05, 60 kDa vs. other nanocarriers) are marked as * (10 kDa); & (20 kDa); # (30 kDa); and + (40 kDa); (B) One-way ANOVA and individual comparison between the groups were determined using Tukey posttests. The statistically significant groups (p<0.05, 60 kDa vs. other nanocarriers are marked as * (10, 20 or 30 kDa); and # (40 kDa at 96 hrs); (C) One-way ANOVA and comparison between the groups were determined using Tukey posttests. The statistically significant groups (p<0.05, 60 kDa vs. other nanocarriers) are denoted by * (10 or 20 kDa); & (30 kDa); # (40 kDa); and + (nanocarriers at 96 hrs).

Journal: Molecular Pharmaceutics

Article Title: Non-Invasive Detection of Passively Targeted Poly(ethylene glycol) Nanocarriers in Tumors

doi: 10.1021/mp2003913

Figure Lengend Snippet: Ex vivo distribution studies: (A) Tissue distribution at 24 hrs; (B) Tumor distribution at 24 and 96 hrs; and (C) Plasma distribution at 24 and 96 hrs. PEG nanocarriers (0.5 mM) were intravenously administered to balb/c mice bearing 4T1 tumors and animals were euthanized to collect tissues. Each column and error bar represents the mean±SD (n = 5–7). The statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism v.4 as follows: (A) Two-way ANOVA and individual comparison between the groups were determined using Bonferroni posttests. The statistically significant groups (p<0.05, 60 kDa vs. other nanocarriers) are marked as * (10 kDa); & (20 kDa); # (30 kDa); and + (40 kDa); (B) One-way ANOVA and individual comparison between the groups were determined using Tukey posttests. The statistically significant groups (p<0.05, 60 kDa vs. other nanocarriers are marked as * (10, 20 or 30 kDa); and # (40 kDa at 96 hrs); (C) One-way ANOVA and comparison between the groups were determined using Tukey posttests. The statistically significant groups (p<0.05, 60 kDa vs. other nanocarriers) are denoted by * (10 or 20 kDa); & (30 kDa); # (40 kDa); and + (nanocarriers at 96 hrs).

Article Snippet: The 4T1 murine breast cancer cell line was a generous gift from Dr. Michael Reiss, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey (New Brunswick, NJ).

Techniques: Ex Vivo, Clinical Proteomics, Comparison